## The NHL standings using a three point system

The NHL point system is broken.

The NHL has focused on fixing things that don’t need to be fixed (the divisions) and breaking things that definitely didn’t need to be fixed (Olympic participation). At the same time they have completely ignored what could be the biggest problem with the league: the point system.

Currently, a team who gets a win, whether it’s in regulation, overtime, or the shootout, gets two points. When a team loses in overtime or the shootout they are awarded one point, and if a team loses in regulation they do not get a point.

At first this sounds like a good points system, but if you look into it you quickly find the flaws.

First of all, simple math. A game that ends in regulation awards two points. But when the game is tied after regulation three points are awarded. So, if a game goes past regulation it is now mathematically 50% more important to the NHL. Should a skills competition be worth that much?

So, knowing now that overtime and shootout games are 50% more important, and knowing that hockey is a team game, why is it that a game becomes more important when we get to a time where only a handful of players matter?

So if we can’t use the current point system, what can we use? Well, why not use the IIHF’s point system? It’s used in many different leagues, and is better suited for a league who would rather avoid ties.

Under the IIHF system, a regulation win nets a team three points, an overtime or shootout win gets two points, and an overtime or shootout loss gets one point. A regulation loss is still worth zero points. This way no game is any more valuable than another game, and a team is rewarded for winning the game in the first sixty minutes.

So, the first question that comes to mind when you talk about this system is, what would the NHL look like if they had this system? Well, the standings would’t change much. No team outside the playoffs would sneak in. There would be a little small change in playoff seeding, as well a few changes for the teams outside of the playoffs.

The playoff match ups in the Eastern conference would be the same except Boston would have home ice advantage over Ottawa.

In the Western conference there is a bit more shuffling around with the wild card teams and the central division. The playoff match ups would look like this:

1st in central Minnesota versus 2nd wild card Calgary

2nd in central Chicago versus 3rd in central St.Louis

1st in pacific Anaheim versus 1st wild card Nashville

2nd in pacific Edmonton versus 3rd in pacific San Jose

Take a look at what the standings would look like for yourself:

 Metropolitan Division Team W OTW OTL L PTS PTS (Current) Position change Washington 45 10 8 19 163 118 NC Pittsburgh 40 10 11 21 151 111 NC Columbus 39 11 8 24 147 108 NC Atlantic Team W OTW OTL L PTS PTS (current) Position change Montreal 33 14 9 26 136 103 NC Boston 38 6 7 31 133 95 1 Ottawa 34 10 10 28 132 98 -1 Eastern Conference Wild Card Team W OTW OTL L PTS PTS (current) Position change New York R 40 8 6 28 142 102 NC Toronto 33 7 15 27 128 95 NC New York I 33 8 12 29 127 94 NC Tampa Bay 32 10 10 30 126 94 NC Carolina 28 8 15 31 115 87 1 Philadelphia 25 14 10 33 113 88 -1 Florida 23 12 11 36 104 81 NC Buffalo 25 8 12 37 103 78 1 Detroit 17 16 13 36 96 79 -1 New Jersey 18 10 14 40 88 70 NC Pacific Team W OTW OTL L PTS PTS (current) Position change Anaheim 40 6 13 23 145 105 NC Edmonton 37 10 9 26 140 103 NC San Jose 38 8 7 29 134 99 NC Central Team W OTW OTL L PTS PTS (current) Position change Minnesota 42 7 8 25 148 106 1 Chicago 37 13 9 23 146 109 -1 St. Louis 38 8 7 29 137 99 NC Western Conference Wild Card Team W OTW OTL L PTS PTS (current) Position change Nashville 35 6 12 29 129 94 NC Calgary 32 13 4 33 126 94 NC Winnipeg 33 7 7 35 120 87 NC Los Angeles 25 14 8 35 111 86 NC Dallas 28 6 11 37 107 79 NC Arizona 20 10 10 42 90 70 NC Vancouver 19 11 9 43 88 69 NC Colorado 14 8 4 56 62 48 W: Regulation wins OTW: Overtime/shootout wins OTL: Overtime/shootout loses PTS: Points using 3 point system PTS (current): Points using NHL’s current point system Position change: Changes in a team position within their respective division

## Guide To Making Your Bracket

The NHL playoffs are just around the corner. People around the hockey world have already jumped to making their own brackets, trying to predict who will win Lord Stanley this year. So, before the games start this Wednesday, April 12th, and before you go and enter your buddies playoff bracket challenge, you need to take a look at this guide to making your bracket.

Many people wonder what to look for when choosing their bracket, and there are so many stats that it’s hard to narrow it down. My personal favorite is a team’s points percentage since the trade deadline. It shows how hot a team has been before the playoffs start, which I believe is a very important predictor of a team’s success in the playoffs. Anecdotally, last year’s Pittsburgh Penguins, who weren’t in a playoff spot at one point in the 2015-16 season, got hot at the right time and went on to win the Cup.

My first round picks:

Washington v Toronto

Winner: Washington

This Capitals team won the presidents trophy for a reason. They are arguably the league’s best team. A young Maple Leafs team even winning a game should be something to be proud of. The Capitals score more and give up fewer goals. The Capitals also had an incredible +81 goal differential in the regular season.

Pittsburgh v Columbus:

Winner: Pittsburgh

An underrated story line in the second half of the regular season is that the Blue Jackets didn’t play great. They had just a 56.8 point percentage, which isn’t terrible, but heading into the post season you would want to play a little better. A big knock on the Penguins going into the playoffs is they are banged up pretty bad, but they have been dealing with a number of injuries for a while and that didn’t stop them from winning games.

Montreal v New York Rangers:

Winner: Montreal

Assuming both teams go into this series playing their best hockey, this will be a close one that could easily go either way. However, the Rangers haven’t been playing their best hockey lately. They have just a 50 point percentage since the trade deadline. Montreal, on the other hand, hold a 71.1 point percentage since the trade deadline. The Ottawa Senators and Boston Bruins started to challenge Montreal for top spot in the Atlantic division and Montreal responded by playing their best hockey all year after picking up Claude Julien.

Ottawa v Boston:

Winner: Boston

This one sounds tight, but looking at the stats it appears otherwise. The Bruins have the edge on Ottawa on almost any stat you look at, from GF%, to SF% and the shot differentials are completely in Boston’s favor. The Bruins are not a great team by any means, but they have the edge on Ottawa in every category necessary.

Chicago v Nashville

Winner: Chicago

These teams are very close when looking at stats. Chicago has the slight edge in goal scoring while Nashville has an even slighter edge in shooting and shot differential. They have both been playing pretty successfully, with Chicago playing a little better. The thing that makes me pick Chicago is their playoff experience. While all these fancy stats are nice, I think something can be said about a team who has had success in the playoffs before.

Minnesota v St. Louis

Winner: Minnesota

I’ve said a lot about a teams points percentage since the trade deadline in this article, and given that you would think I picked the Blues to win this series. They have a strong 76.2% since the deadline. However, while Minnesota did struggle for a long period of time, I believe they’ve gotten over it in the last couple weeks of the season after winning four straight to end the year. And given that, I think the Minnesota Wild are a better team than the Blues all around. Minnesota has a much better GF%.

Anaheim v Calgary:

Winner: Anaheim

The Ducks have had a 81.6% points percentage since the trade deadline, and they finished the season with a four game winning streak. The Ducks have a 53.1% GF%. Both better than the Flames. Calgary should be proud to be back in the playoffs after missing out last season, but much like the Maple Leafs I don’t think they have much of a chance against the Ducks in the first round. I believe Anaheim is a real cup contender this year and no one seems to notice them.

Edmonton v San Jose:

Winner: Edmonton

If the season only started at the trade deadline the Sharks wouldn’t be in the playoffs. They have a 47.6 points percentage since the trade deadline. If they didn’t start the season strong they would have been in big trouble this year. Overall the numbers between these teams are close, but I don’t think San Jose can turn their game around in time to make a serious run in the playoffs.

GF60, GA60, GF%, SF60, SA60, SF%, FF%, CF% all in 5v5 only

stats from: http://stats.hockeyanalysis.com/teamstats.php?db=201617&sit=5v5&disp=1&sortdir=DESC&sort=GFPCT

 Team GF60 GA60 GF% SF60 SA60 SF% FF% CF% DIFF PP% PK% Special teams points % since trade deadline streak Points EAST Washington 2.73 1.72 61.40% 29.8 27.4 52.10% 51.40% 51.80% 81 23.1 83.8 106.9 69% 1L 118 VS Toronto 2.54 2.43 51.10% 30.6 31.6 49.20% 49.70% 50.40% 9 24.2 82.3 106.5 61.90% 1L 95 Pittsburgh 2.81 2.28 55.20% 32.8 31 51.40% 51.20% 50.10% 48 23.1 79.8 102.9 61.40% 2L 111 VS Columbus 2.51 1.98 55.90% 30.9 29.4 51.20% 50.40% 50.30% 54 19.9 82.5 102.4 56.80% 1W 108 Montreal 2.29 1.92 54.30% 30.4 28.5 51.60% 52.40% 52.50% 26 19.6 81.1 100.7 71.10% 1W 103 VS New York R 2.51 2.3 52.20% 28.3 29.9 48.70% 48.80% 47.90% 36 20.2 79.8 100 50% 1W 102 Ottawa 2.07 2.16 48.90% 29.4 29.3 50.10% 48.80% 48.50% -2 17 79.7 96.7 61.90% 1L 98 VS Boston 2.2 2.28 49.10% 32.3 26.2 55.20% 55.30% 54.70% 22 21.7 85.7 107.4 62.50% 1L 95 WEST Chicago 2.43 2.01 54.70% 29.7 30.1 49.70% 50% 50.40% 31 18 77.7 95.7 65% 1OTL 109 VS Nashville 2.42 2.15 53% 30.9 29.2 51.40% 51% 51.40% 16 18.9 80.9 99.8 57.50% 1L 94 Minnesota 2.73 2.19 55.50% 29.9 29.4 50.50% 49.90% 49.40% 58 21 82.9 103.9 45.50% 4W 106 VS St.Louis 2.43 2.08 52.90% 27.9 27.4 50.50% 50.50% 50.20% 17 21.3 84.8 106.1 76.20% 3W 99 Ahnaheim 2.25 1.98 53.10% 28.9 28.3 50.60% 50.10% 49.70% 23 18.7 84.7 103.4 81.60% 4W 105 VS Calgary 2.16 2.22 49.30% 28.5 27.8 50.60% 50.10% 50.60% 5 20.2 81.6 101.8 63.20% 1L 94 Edmonton 2.48 2.09 54.30% 29.9 28.7 51% 50.90% 49.90% 35 22.9 80.7 103.6 76.30% 3W 103 VS San Jose 2.28 2.03 53% 28.9 26.8 51.80% 52% 51.10% 20 16.7 80.7 97.4 47.60% 1W 99

## Just How Good Were the Los Angeles Kings?

In 2012, the Los Angeles Kings went on an amazing run to the Stanley Cup Finals where they beat the New Jersey Devils in 6 games, as the 8th seed out of the Western Conference. Just two years later, in 2014, they won Lord Stanley’s prize again, this time after finishing 10th in the NHL.

Following their 2014 Stanley Cup win they had been deemed one of the NHL’s best teams, alongside the Chicago Blackhawks. But were they ever really that good, or did they just get hot at the right time?

During the 2012 run, LA made the playoffs by just 5 points, beating out the Calgary Flames for the 8th and final playoff spot. The team had to face the 1st place Vancouver Canucks in the first round of the playoffs. It seemed impossible for them to pull off the upset, but clearly nobody told them, as they went on to win the series in just five games. Next up was the St. Louis Blues, and once again the Kings won it with ease, this time pulling off the four game sweep. After this was the Western Conference Finals, against the, then Phoenix Coyotes. The Kings took the series in just 5 games. They went on to the Stanley Cup Finals where they beat the New Jersey Devils in 6 games. The Kings won the cup after playing just 20 playoff games.

What made this run so unbelievable was that they barely made the Playoffs and didn’t exactly put up great numbers during the regular season. That year the LA Kings averaged just 1.84 goals per game in 5v5 situations, second last in the NHL. They had a shooting percentage of just 6.03% in 5v5 situations, last in the NHL. They couldn’t score any goals. Their leading goal scorer was Anze Kopitar with 25 goals on the year.

After winning the Cup in 2012, despite having trouble scoring any goals, the Kings were labeled a team to look out for entering the 2014 Playoffs. This time around they faced the San Jose Sharks in the first round, and after a hard fought series that went 7 games, the Kings were victorious.

In the second round they played the Anaheim Ducks, and once again the Kings won the series after playing 7 games.  Then came the Western Conference Finals against the previous victors, the Chicago Blackhawks. For the third straight series, it went to 7 games, but despite playing their 21st playoff game in game 7 of the Western Conference Finals, the Kings managed to pull off the win, booking their ticket to the Stanley Cup Finals. In the Finals, the Kings would meet the New York Rangers, who had also played a lot of games in the playoffs that year (20 games for the Rangers.) Many expected a long series after both of these teams had played so many games in the playoffs, but this series wouldn’t last long as the LA Kings won the series in 5 games, winning their second Cup in three years.

This time around the Kings were expected to be more dominant, and in the regular season they finished with 5 more points than they did two seasons prior. But did they manage to figure out their scoring woes? They did improve their goals per game at 5v5 from 1.84 to 2.03, but still sat 5th last in the league in the category. They also improved their 5v5 shooting percentage from 6.03% to 6.51%, but remained 2nd last in the league in that category. They did, however, get a much better individual scoring performance from Anze Kopitar, who had a shooting percentage of 14.5% and had 29 goals, but 10 of those goals came on the power play. Other than Kopitar there was only one 20+ goal scorer on the team, Jeff Carter. So in the two years following the 2012 Stanley Cup run they were still having trouble putting the puck in the net, and because of that, they still weren’t a dominant regular season club.

The LA Kings were one of the first NHL teams to really buy into the Corsi trend that swept the NHL around the time they won their first Cup. They have been one of the best possession teams over the last several years. They also rely heavily on the goaltending of Jonathan Quick, who has been arguably one of the best goaltenders in the NHL since the Kings Cup run of 2012. While having a good possession numbers and solid goaltending may be important, at the end of the day you’re going to have trouble winning if you can’t score goals, and the current LA Kings are a great example of that.

It seems as though, until a new management core takes over in LA, which I don’t believe is entirely necessary yet, the Kings will be a team that just always has the puck and will shoot a fair bit, but will have difficulty getting it past the goalie. Dating back prior to the 2011-12 season the Kings have been having trouble scoring, so one would think they would go out and find a decent goal scorer. To their credit, they did pick up the 5v5 goal scoring for a few years during the 2014-15 and 2015-16 seasons, but their offensive production has plummeted this season.